Current Search: Folder 1207 (x)
Pages
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 20, 1922 Fifth Circuit Case.
-
Author
-
The United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
-
Abstract/Description
-
Unsigned document dating January 20, 1922 regarding the transmission of the suit to the Fifth Judicial Court at New Orleans, Louisiana.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_177
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 26, 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Frank H. Mortimer, Judge Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
January 26, 1922 letter from the Office of the Clerk United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, Louisiana to Judge Carter in Pensacola, FL from Frank H. Mortimer stating that the briefs in the Texas Co vs Pensacola Maritime Corporation suit have been filed.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_203_204
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 28, 1922 Knight, Thompson, & Turner Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Knight, Thompson, & Turner, Judge Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
January 28, 1922 letter from Knight, Thompson, & Turner of Tampa, FL to Judge Carter in Pensacola thanking him for the copy of the brief for the Texas Company vs. Pensacola Maritime Corporation suit.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_189
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, July 1, 1921 Judge Sheppard Ruling.
-
Author
-
District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida
-
Abstract/Description
-
July 1, 1921 ruling by Judge Sheppard denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial in the case of Pensacola Maritime Corporation (plaintiff) vs. The Texas Company (defendant).
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_155
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, July 1920 Palmer Pillans Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Palmer Pillans, Carter and Yonge, The Texas Company
-
Abstract/Description
-
July 18, 1921 letter from Palmer Pillans, lawyer for the Texas Company, to Carter & Yonge regarding their meeting and enclosing copies of the documents to be sent to Judge Maxwell, including the following: “Petition for writ of error, Assignment of error, Prayer for reversal, Order allowing writ of error, Citation in error, Motion for fixing amount of supersedes, Bond and order grading the said motion.” July 21, 1921 response to Palmer Pillans from Blount and Yonge.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_160_161
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, July 25, 1921 Correspondence on Testimony.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, Judge Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
July 25, 1921 letter from William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation to Judge Carter providing a copy of the testimony in the Pensacola Maritime Corporation (plaintiff) vs. The Texas Company (defendant) suit.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_165
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, June 1, 1922 Judge Carter Correspondence.
-
Author
-
J.S. Keith, Lambert Brothers, Inc
-
Abstract/Description
-
June 1, 1922 letter from the Lambert Brothers, Inc to Carter and Yonge requesting the details of the case. Response to J.S. Keith, care of the Lambert Brothers, Inc, detailing the decisions of the court as pertains to the claims on losses for the S.S. OHIOAN.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_387_389
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, June 13, 1921 Letter on Net Income of Texas Co.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, Judge Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
June 13, 1921 letter from William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation to Judge Carter regarding the net income of the Texas Company and the amount of cash they have on hand.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_147
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, June 14, 1922 Congratulations to Judge Carter.
-
Author
-
Judge Carter, Maggie C. ——
-
Abstract/Description
-
Handwritten note dated June 14, 1922 from Tallahassee, FL congratulating Judge Carter on his success in the case.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_394_395
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, June 1921 J.H. Peterson Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Judge Carter, J.H. Peterson
-
Abstract/Description
-
Series of letters between Judge Carter in Pensacola, FL and the law offices of J.H. Peterson in Lakeland, FL.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_150_159
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, June 2, 1922 Edward J. A. Rook Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Edward J. A. Rook, Carter and Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
June 2, 1922 letter from Edward J. A. Rook to Carter and Yonge enclosing a bill for $15.00 for his role in taking the depositions of Clarence F. Gregory and Bernard C. Thompson on May 15, 1922. June 9, 1922 typed bill. June 15, 1922 letter receipting the $15.00 check.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_391_396
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, June 2, 1922 U.S. Marshal Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Carter and Yonge, Peter H. Miller
-
Abstract/Description
-
June 2, 1922 letter from Peter H. Miller, U.S. Marshall in the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola, to Carter and Yonge enclosing the bill from jury meals from Hughey’s Restaurant.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_390
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March - April 1922 Carter & Yonge Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Pensacola Maritime Corporation, Carter & Yonge, Clinchfield Navigation Co, Chas. M. Barnett
-
Abstract/Description
-
March - April 1922 correspondence between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and Clinchfield Navigation Company regarding six questions posed by Carter & Yonge for the purposes of proving damages in the case against the Texas Co
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 11, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence.
-
Author
-
C. M. Barnett, William H. Knowles
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 11, 1922 letter from Mr. Barnett of Clinchfield Navigation Company in New York to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation offering an opinion that the Texas Co will compromise following the ruling that the contract was valid but improper instructions were sent to the jury regarding the amount of damages.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_209
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG2000)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 15, 1922 William H. Knowles Correspondence.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, Carter & Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
Seres of communications dated March 15, 1922 regarding Pensacola Maritime Corporation business dealings with Clinchfield Navigation Co, the S.S. OHIOAN, and the S.S. MUNSOMO.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_210_212
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 16, 1922 William H. Knowles Correspondence.
-
Author
-
C. M. Barnett, Clinchfield Navigation, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
-
Abstract/Description
-
Unsigned letter fated March 16, 1922 to Chas. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Company in New York, presumably from William H. Knowles. Letter refers to Ellis Knowles.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_213
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 1921 Correspondence on Amended Pleas.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, Blount, Blount, & Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 12, 1921 letter from William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation to Blount, Blount, & Carter regarding the amended pleas of the Texas Company.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_101
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 1921 Correspondence on S.S. OHIOAN.
-
Author
-
John A. Merritt, Pensacola Maritime Corporation, Blount, Blount, & Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 1921 correspondence between John A. Merritt & Co and the Pensacola Maritime Corporation regarding damages for non-supplying of fuel oil in May 1920 to the S.S. “Ohioan”. Correspondence is forwarded to Blount, Blount, & Carter
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_96_104
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 20, 1922 Carter & Yonge Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Carter & Yonge, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 20, 1922 letter from Carter & Yonge to Pensacola Maritime Corporation regarding the claims brought by the S.S. “Ohioan” for costs associated with oil bunkering at the port at New Orleans. Letter explains what will be required for the case, including witnesses who have personal knowledge of the specified costs.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_214_216
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, C. M. Barnett
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the...
Show moreMarch 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the circumstance of high demand for oil at the time.
Show less
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_218_219
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
Pages