You are here

Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 8, 1922 de bene esse Testimony

Full Screen View

Summary:
1 page document which states that Frederick Roehl, N.O. Pedrick, W.J. Hammond, Biddle Hammond, Fenwick Eustis, _____ McLeod, and Andrew Hudson, witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff (Pensacola Maritime Corporation), will be examined de bene esse before Allan R. Beary, a public notary for the state of Louisiana.
Title: Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 8, 1922 de bene esse Testimony.
11 views
Name(s): District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida
Type of Resource: still image
Genre: Legal Documents
Issuance: single unit
Date Created: April 8, 1922
Place of Publication: Pensacola, Florida
Extent: 1 page document
Language(s): English
Summary: 1 page document which states that Frederick Roehl, N.O. Pedrick, W.J. Hammond, Biddle Hammond, Fenwick Eustis, _____ McLeod, and Andrew Hudson, witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff (Pensacola Maritime Corporation), will be examined de bene esse before Allan R. Beary, a public notary for the state of Louisiana.
Identifier: folder1206_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_object28_3 (IID)
Note(s): A project of the Gulf Coast Maritime History and Heritage Digital Portal Project
Subject(s): fuel oil
Legal history
Contract dispute
Gulf Coast
1920s
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/uwf/fd/folder1206_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_object28_3
Use and Reproduction: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/
Host Institution: UWF

In Collections