Current Search:   C. M. Barnett (x)

VIEW ALL ITEMS

  • CSV Spreadsheet
(1 - 9 of 9)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence to Knowles
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence to Knowles.
Author
William H. Knowles, C. M. Barnett
Abstract/Description
March 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation enclosing information helpful for establishing damages in the case. March 28, 1922 response thanking C. M. Barnett for his letters.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_220_221
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 11, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 11, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence.
Author
C. M. Barnett, William H. Knowles
Abstract/Description
March 11, 1922 letter from Mr. Barnett of Clinchfield Navigation Company in New York to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation offering an opinion that the Texas Co will compromise following the ruling that the contract was valid but improper instructions were sent to the jury regarding the amount of damages.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_209
Format
Image (JPEG2000)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence.
Author
William H. Knowles, C. M. Barnett
Abstract/Description
March 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the...
Show moreMarch 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the circumstance of high demand for oil at the time.
Show less
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_218_219
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 11, 1922 Pensacola Finance Co Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 11, 1922 Pensacola Finance Co Correspondence.
Author
C. M. Barnett, Pensacola Finance Co
Abstract/Description
April 11, 1922 letter to C.M Barnett in New York regarding his lack of response to a number of previous inquiries.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_314_315
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 16, 1922 William H. Knowles Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 16, 1922 William H. Knowles Correspondence.
Author
C. M. Barnett, Clinchfield Navigation, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
Abstract/Description
Unsigned letter fated March 16, 1922 to Chas. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Company in New York, presumably from William H. Knowles. Letter refers to Ellis Knowles.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_213
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 11, 1922 Barnett and Howard Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 11, 1922 Barnett and Howard Correspondence.
Author
C. M. Barnett, A. J. Howard, William H. Knowles
Abstract/Description
April 11, 1922 letter from C.M. Barnett and A.J. Howard to William H. Knowles regarding depositions and the J. H. W. Steele contract.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_301a
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, folder 1204, April 1920 copy of contract
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, folder 1204, April 1920 copy of contract.
Author
Blount & Blount & Carter
Abstract/Description
3-page copy of a contract with The Texas Oil Company dated April 30, 1920 sent from Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland firm of New York. Contract stipulates delivery of oil to the J.H.W. Steele Company in both New York and New Orleans. Pensacola Maritime Corporation is designated as the selling agent. Commitments for both the number of barrels to be sold and prices per barrel by quality of the oil are designated. A handwritten note at the end states that the contract is a copy of a contract drawn...
Show more3-page copy of a contract with The Texas Oil Company dated April 30, 1920 sent from Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland firm of New York. Contract stipulates delivery of oil to the J.H.W. Steele Company in both New York and New Orleans. Pensacola Maritime Corporation is designated as the selling agent. Commitments for both the number of barrels to be sold and prices per barrel by quality of the oil are designated. A handwritten note at the end states that the contract is a copy of a contract drawn up by C.M. Barnett.
Show less
Identifier
folder1204_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_April1920contractcopy
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, folder 1204, April 1920 copy of contract, page 3
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, folder 1204, April 1920 copy of contract, page 3.
Author
Blount & Blount & Carter
Abstract/Description
3-page copy of a contract with The Texas Oil Company dated April 30, 1920 sent from Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland firm of New York. Contract stipulates delivery of oil to the J.H.W. Steele Company in both New York and New Orleans. Pensacola Maritime Corporation is designated as the selling agent. Commitments for both the number of barrels to be sold and prices per barrel by quality of the oil are designated. A handwritten note at the end states that the contract is a copy of a contract drawn...
Show more3-page copy of a contract with The Texas Oil Company dated April 30, 1920 sent from Root, Clark, Buckner & Howland firm of New York. Contract stipulates delivery of oil to the J.H.W. Steele Company in both New York and New Orleans. Pensacola Maritime Corporation is designated as the selling agent. Commitments for both the number of barrels to be sold and prices per barrel by quality of the oil are designated. A handwritten note at the end states that the contract is a copy of a contract drawn up by C.M. Barnett.
Show less
Identifier
folder1204_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_April1920contractcopy_3
Format
Image (JPEG2000)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 1920 telegram correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 1920 telegram correspondence.
Author
Arthur J. Howard, C H M Barnett, A J Howard, Central Marine Corporation, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
Abstract/Description
Three telegrams from May 1920 discussing contract negotiations with the J.H.W. Steele Company. The telegrams discuss buyer/seller responsibility for sale and delivery of oil, a redrawn contract, and issues with the Shippingboard position on private oil bunkering contracts.
Identifier
folder1204_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_May1920telegramcorrespondence
Format
Set of related objects