Current Search:   District Court of the United States (x)

VIEW ALL ITEMS

  • CSV Spreadsheet
(1 - 9 of 9)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Depositions of W.H. George, Thomas H. Taylor, and Robert G. Ingersell
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Depositions of W.H. George, Thomas H. Taylor, and Robert G. Ingersell.
Author
District Court of the United States
Abstract/Description
Depositions of W.H. George, Thomas H. Taylor, and Robert G. Ingersell, witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff.
Identifier
Folder1208_Packet1
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 20, 1922 Fifth Circuit Case
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 20, 1922 Fifth Circuit Case.
Author
The United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Abstract/Description
Unsigned document dating January 20, 1922 regarding the transmission of the suit to the Fifth Judicial Court at New Orleans, Louisiana.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_177
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 23, 1921 Record of Court Proceedings and Testimony
Abstract/Description
Record of court proceedings/testimony from the Pensacola Maritime Corporation (plaintiff) vs. The Texas Company (defendant). The packet is missing pages 34 and 35.
Identifier
Folder1208_Packet2
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 23, 1921 Record of Court Proceedings and Testimony, 2
Abstract/Description
Record of court proceedings/testimony from the Pensacola Maritime Corporation (plaintiff) vs. The Texas Company (defendant). The packet is missing pages 34 and 35.
Identifier
Folder1208_Packet2_2
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 8, 1922 de bene esse Testimony
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 8, 1922 de bene esse Testimony.
Author
District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida
Abstract/Description
1 page document which states that Frederick Roehl, N.O. Pedrick, W.J. Hammond, Biddle Hammond, Fenwick Eustis, _____ McLeod, and Andrew Hudson, witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff (Pensacola Maritime Corporation), will be examined de bene esse before Allan R. Beary, a public notary for the state of Louisiana.
Identifier
folder1206_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_object28_3
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, July 1, 1921 Judge Sheppard Ruling
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, July 1, 1921 Judge Sheppard Ruling.
Author
District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida
Abstract/Description
July 1, 1921 ruling by Judge Sheppard denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial in the case of Pensacola Maritime Corporation (plaintiff) vs. The Texas Company (defendant).
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_155
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 30, 1922 Jury Verdict
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 30, 1922 Jury Verdict.
Author
District Court of the United States, Northern District of Florida
Abstract/Description
May 30, 1922 handwritten jury verdict from the District Court of the United States, Northern District of Florida, from the case of Pensacola Maritime Corporation vs. The Texas Company. The jury presents a verdict favorable to the plaintiff and assesses damages at $355,678.40.
Identifier
Folder1209_object14_1
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 23, 1922 de bene esse notice
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 23, 1922 de bene esse notice.
Author
Blount & Blount & Carter, E.C. Maxwell, District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida
Abstract/Description
Notice to the lawyers for the defendant (the Texas Company) that T.J. Sullivan, Robert G. Ingersoll, H.D. Shean, W.H. George and Thomas H. Taylor, witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff (Pensacola Maritime Corporation), will be examined de bene esse. One copy is unsigned and one is signed by E.C. Maxwell, attorney for defendant, and Blount & Blount & Carter, attorneys for the plaintiff. Draft form of deposition is included as well as handwritten notes.
Identifier
folder1206_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_object32
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, de bene esse Testimony
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, de bene esse Testimony.
Author
District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida, E.C Maxwell, Palmer Pillans, The Texas Company
Abstract/Description
3 pages of documents which state that A. Foss and Eugene Wolenberger, witnesses on behalf of the plaintiff (Pensacola Maritime Corporation), will be examined de bene esse; documents contain instructions to the jury and indicate the alleged amount of damages as well as the difference between contract price and market prices of oil.
Identifier
folder1206_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_object26
Format
Set of related objects