Current Search:  Circuit Court of Appeals (x)

VIEW ALL ITEMS

  • CSV Spreadsheet
(1 - 7 of 7)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Trial Date Request
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Trial Date Request.
Author
Attorneys for the plaintiff in error, Attorneys for the defendant in error
Abstract/Description
Document addressed “To the Honorable The Judges of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals” in New. Orleans, Louisiana. Letter requests trial date be set for Monday, January 30, 1922.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_172_173
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 26, 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, January 26, 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence.
Author
Frank H. Mortimer, Judge Carter
Abstract/Description
January 26, 1922 letter from the Office of the Clerk United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, Louisiana to Judge Carter in Pensacola, FL from Frank H. Mortimer stating that the briefs in the Texas Co vs Pensacola Maritime Corporation suit have been filed.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_203_204
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, February - March 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, February - March 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence.
Author
Carter & Yonge, Frank H. Mortimer
Abstract/Description
February 18, 1922 letter to F. H. Mortimer, Clerk in the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, New Orleans, Louisiana, from Carter & Yonge requesting a copy of the opinion of the Court in the case of Texas Co vs Pensacola Maritime Corporation.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_205_207
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 28, 1922 N. O. Pedrick Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 28, 1922 N. O. Pedrick Correspondence.
Author
N. O. Pedrick, John A. Merritt & Co
Abstract/Description
March 28, 1922 letter from N. O. Pedrick to John A. Merritt & Co in Pensacola, FL stating that he and their auditor Mr. Frederick Roehl would be willing to testify regarding the expenses associated with the S.S. “OHIOAN.”
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_222
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 1922 Frank H. Mortimer Correspondence.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_254_267
Format
Set of related objects
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Fifth Circuit Oral Argument Extension
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Fifth Circuit Oral Argument Extension.
Author
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Abstract/Description
Legal document of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in the suit The Texas Company (Plaintiff in Error) vs. Pensacola Maritime Corporation (Defendant in Error) regarding the filing of Transcript of Record and an extension time for oral arguments. Unsigned by the attorneys for plaintiff in error and attorneys for defendant in error.
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_174
Format
Image (JPEG)
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence
Title
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence.
Author
William H. Knowles, C. M. Barnett
Abstract/Description
March 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the...
Show moreMarch 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the circumstance of high demand for oil at the time.
Show less
Identifier
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_218_219
Format
Set of related objects