Current Search: Oil price (x)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Purchase Agreement.
-
Abstract/Description
-
Blank Pensacola Maritime Corporation purchase agreement and memorandum of sale on bunker oils and maritime lubricating oils. Includes provisions of sale and contract.
-
Identifier
-
folder1206_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_object40
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May-September Calculations on Scrap Paper.
-
Abstract/Description
-
Handwritten note, May - September calculations with a total of $572.145.70.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object8_1
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Amount of Damages Handwritten List.
-
Author
-
Carter & Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
Handwritten note describing the amount of damages from May 31, 1920 - September 30, 1920, with a total listed at $559,167.89. Note also lists the difference between contract prices and market prices of oil.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object23_1
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 14, 1922 W. H. Knowles Correspondence.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, Judge Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
April 14, 1922 telegram copy from William H. Knowles to Judge Carter, care of Allen R. Beary at 823 Canal-Commercial Bank Building in New Orleans, LA, informing him that A. Hudson will not be able to travel south but will be in New York when Carter arrives there.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_321
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 30, 1922 Sun Line Inc Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Sun Line Inc
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 30, 1922 letter from Sun Line Inc stating that during the months of May - September 1920, Sun Line Inc would have purchased grade C fuel oil for bunkering at the price listed in the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Co. He also notes that due to the scarcity of grade C fuel oil at the time, it was selling for $7.00/barrel in New York during that time.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_229
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 30, 1922 Jury Verdict.
-
Author
-
District Court of the United States, Northern District of Florida
-
Abstract/Description
-
May 30, 1922 handwritten jury verdict from the District Court of the United States, Northern District of Florida, from the case of Pensacola Maritime Corporation vs. The Texas Company. The jury presents a verdict favorable to the plaintiff and assesses damages at $355,678.40.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object14_1
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Suggestions of Amendments to Bill of Exceptions.
-
Author
-
Carter & Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
3 page document entitled "Suggestions of Amendments to Bill of Exceptions in the Case of Pensacola Maritime Corporation Against the Texas Company." Contains handwritten notes.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object19
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, November 1919 correspondence.
-
Author
-
C.E. Woodbridge, The Texas Company, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
-
Abstract/Description
-
Series of business communications from November 1919 between The Texas Company and the Pensacola Maritime Corporation primarily regarding the contract forms being returned from Europe to The Texas Company.
-
Identifier
-
folder1204_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_November1919correspondence
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 1921 Spencer, Fenner, Gidiere, & Phelps Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Blount, Blount, & Carter, Spencer, Fenner, Gidiere, & Phelps
-
Abstract/Description
-
April 1921 correspondence between Blount, Blount, & Carter and Spencer, Fenner, Gidiere, & Phelps in New Orleans regarding the market value of fuel oil during the period from May 1st to October 1st, 1920 and providing an introduction to Mr. Jas. F. Phillips, a representative of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_110_112
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, S.S. Munsomo Account.
-
Abstract/Description
-
Document entitled “S.S. ‘MUNSOMO’ - LOSS ACCT. CANCELLATION FUEL CONTRACT PENSACOLA.” Lists the May dates on which the S.S. MUNSOMO arrived and departed Pensacola and New Orleans and lists expenses.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_231
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 18, 1922 A. Hudson Correspondence.
-
Author
-
Thomas E. Ward, A. Hudson
-
Abstract/Description
-
April 18, 1922 letter from A. Hudson regarding his testimony on oil sales in 1920.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_290_
-
Format
-
Image (JPEG)
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, S.S. OHIOAN Charter Party.
-
Author
-
John A. Merritt & Co, The Lambert Brothers, Inc, Carter & Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
April 17, 1922 letter from John A. Merritt & Co to Carter & Yonge regarding the S.S. Ohioan and enclosing a copy of the Charter Party from The Lambert Brothers, Inc.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_328_330
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, May 29-30, 1922 Handwritten Notes.
-
Author
-
James F. Phillips, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
-
Abstract/Description
-
7 pages of handwritten notes, several dated May 29 or May 30, 1922. Notes consist of financial claim numbers of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation in the case against the Texas Company. Most are signed with the initials JFP, likely James F. Phillips of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object15
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Legal Argument Excerpt.
-
Author
-
Carter & Yonge, Pensacola Maritime Corporation
-
Abstract/Description
-
3 page typed excerpt of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation's legal argument regarding the contracted sale and delivery of oil and 6 pages of handwritten notes.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object2
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Mutuality of Contract Handwritten Notes.
-
Author
-
Carter & Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
13 page packet of handwritten notes, including financial figures, information on legal precedent, and mutuality of contract.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object18
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, S.S. Ohioan Bill.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles
-
Abstract/Description
-
Set of 3 documents: 1 handwritten note on scrap paper, 1 enveloped addressed to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Company dated March 2, 1922, and 1 bill from the S.S. Ohioan dated May 19, 1920 with a handwritten note stating that it was paid on 5/22/20.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object24
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, November 1920 Oil Price Memorandum.
-
Abstract/Description
-
Memorandum on fuel oil prices, dated November 3, 1920. Document includes contract prices with the Texas Company, J.H.W. Steele Co., the Island Refining Corporation, and Robert G. Ingersoll of United States Shipping Board of New Orleans from March 1920 to May 1920.
-
Identifier
-
folder1204_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_November920oilpricememorandum
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, March 24, 1922 C. M. Barnett Correspondence.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, C. M. Barnett
-
Abstract/Description
-
March 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the...
Show moreMarch 24, 1922 letter from C. M. Barnett of the Clinchfield Navigation Company to William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation following the decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans that the contract between Pensacola Maritime Corporation and the Texas Company was valid and that the case needed to be granted a new trial in order to assess damages. Barnett’s letter details oil prices at the time and advises that establishing damages should be easy, given the circumstance of high demand for oil at the time.
Show less
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_218_219
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, April 28, 1921 Correspondence on Original 1919 Contract.
-
Author
-
William H. Knowles, Blount, Blount, & Carter
-
Abstract/Description
-
April 28, 1921 letter from William H. Knowles of the Pensacola Maritime Corporation to Blount, Blount, & Carter, attention Judge Carter, regarding the original contract which refers to the Pensacola Maritime Corporation as the “purchaser” and the Texas Company as the “seller.” This point is in response to comments made by Judge Maxwell.
-
Identifier
-
folder1207_pensacolamaritimecorpvsthetexascorp_124_125
-
Format
-
Set of related objects
-
-
Title
-
Pensacola Maritime vs. Texas Company, Handwritten Notes.
-
Author
-
Carter & Yonge
-
Abstract/Description
-
Series of handwritten notes concerning the contents of the disputed contract and the contract’s validity.
-
Identifier
-
Folder1209_object20
-
Format
-
Set of related objects